RULES OF EVIDENCE
FOR THE
TRIAL DIVISION OF THE KOSRAE STATE COURT
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

ARTICLE I.   GENERAL PROVISIONS

 Rule 101.
SCOPE
     These rules govern proceedings in the Kosrae State Court of the Federated States of Micronesia and before state judicial officers acting on matters within the jurisdiction of the Kosrae State Court of the Federated States of Micronesia pursuant to the Federated States of Micronesia Kosrae State Court Rules of Civil Procedure, or Criminal Procedure, to the extent and with the exceptions stated in rule 1101.

 Rule 102.
PURPOSE AND CONSTRUCTION
     These rules shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay, and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and proceedings justly determined.

 Rule 103.
RULING ON EVIDENCE
     (a)     Effect of erroneous ruling.   Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected, and:

          (1)     Objection.   In case the ruling is one admitting evidence, a timely objection or motion to strike appears of record, stating the ground of objection, if the specific ground was not apparent from the context; or

          (2)     Offer of proof.   In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked.

     (b)     Record of offer and ruling.  The court may add any other or further statement which shows the character of the evidence, the form in which it was offered, the objection made, and the ruling thereon.  It may direct the making of an offer in question and answer form.

     (c)     Vacant.

     (d)     Plain error.   Nothing in this rule precludes taking notice of plain errors affecting substantial rights although they were not brought to the attention of the court.

 Rule 104.
PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS
     (a)     Questions of admissibility generally.   Preliminary questions concerning the qualification of a person to be a witness, the existence of a privilege, or the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by the court, subject to the provisions of subdivision (b).  In making its determination it is not bound by the rules of evidence except those with respect to privileges.
 
     (b)     Relevancy conditioned on fact.  When the relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition.

     (c)     Vacant.

     (d)     Testimony by accused.  The accused does not, by testifying  upon a preliminary matter, subject himself to cross-examination as to other issues in the case.

     (e)     Weight and credibility.  This rule does not limit the right of a party to introduce evidence relevant to weight or credibility.

 Rule 105.
LIMITED ADMISSIBILITY
     When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the court, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope.

 Rule 106.
REMAINDER OF OR RELATED WRITINGS
OR RECORDED STATEMENTS
     When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require him at that time to introduce any other part or any other writing or recorded statement which ought in fairness to be considered contemporaneously with it.

ARTICLE II.  JUDICIAL NOTICE

 Rule 201.
JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
     (a)     Scope of rule.   This rule governs only judicial notice of adjudicative facts.

     (b)     Kinds of facts.    A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.

     (c)     When discretionary.   A court may take judicial notice, whether requested or not.

     (d)     When mandatory.       A court shall take judicial notice if requested by a party and supplied with the necessary information.

     (e)     Opportunity to be heard.   A party is entitled upon timely request to an opportunity to be heard as to the propriety of taking judicial notice and the tenor of the matter noticed.  In the absence of prior notification, the request may be made after judicial notice has been taken.

     (f)     Time of taking notice.  Judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding.

     (g)     Vacant.

ARTICLE III.  PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL ACTIONS
AND PROCEEDINGS

 Rule 301.
PRESUMPTIONS IN GENERAL
IN CIVIL ACTION AND PROCEEDINGS
     In all civil actions and proceedings not otherwise provided for by Act of Legislature or by these rules, a presumption imposes on the party against whom it is directed the burden of going forward with evidence to rebut or meet the presumption, but does not shift to such party the burden of proof in the sense of risk of nonpersuasion, which remains throughout the trial upon the party on whom it was originally cast.

 Rule 302.
APPLICABILITY OF STATE LAW IN CIVIL ACTIONS
AND PROCEEDINGS
     In civil actions and proceedings, the effect of a presumption respecting a fact which is an element of a claim or defense as to which State law supplies the rule of decision is determined in accordance with State law.

ARTICLE IV.  RELEVANCY AND ITS LIMITS

 Rule 401.
DEFINITION OF "RELEVANT EVIDENCE"
     "Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.

 Rule 402.
RELEVANT EVIDENCE GENERALLY ADMISSIBLE;
IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE.
     All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided by the Constitution of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Constitution of the State of Kosrae,  Act of Congress, Act of the Legislature or these rules.  Evidence which is not relevant is not admissible.

 Rule 403.
EXCLUSION OF RELEVANT EVIDENCE ON GROUNDS OF
PREJUDICE, CONFUSION, OR WASTE OF TIME
     Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.

 Rule 404.
CHARACTER EVIDENCE NOT ADMISSIBLE TO PROVE
 CONDUCT:  EXCEPTIONS:  OTHER CRIMES
     (a)     Character evidence generally.  Evidence of a person's character or a trait of his character is not admissible for the purpose of  proving that he acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except:
 
          (1)     Character of accused.  Evidence of a pertinent trait of his character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same;

          (2)     Character of victim.  Evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same or evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor;

          (3)     Character of witness.  Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in rules 607, 608 and 609.
 
     (b)     Other crimes, wrongs, or acts.    Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith.  It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.

 Rule 405.
METHODS OF PROVING CHARACTER
     (a)     Reputation of opinion.   In all cases in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion.  On cross-examination, inquiry is allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.

     (b)     Specific instance of conduct.  In cases in which character or a trait of character of a person is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense, proof  may also be made of specific instances of his conduct.

 Rule 406.
HABIT; ROUTINE PRACTICE
     Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eye witnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice.

 Rule 407.
SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES
     When, after an event, measures are taken which, it taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.  This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of subsequent measures when offered for another purpose, such as proving ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures, if controverted, or impeachment.

 Rule 408.
COMPROMISE AND OFFERS TO COMPROMISE
     Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim or its amount.  Evidence of conduct or statements made in compromise negotiations or in proposing or participating in a customary apology  or customary settlement is likewise not admissible.  This rule does not require the exclusion of any factual evidence otherwise discoverable merely becuase it is presented or discussed in the course of compromise negotiations or in proposing or participating in a customary apology or customary settlement.  This rule also does not require exclusion when the evidence is offered for another purpose, such as proving bias or prejudice of a witness, negativing a a contention of undue delay or proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.

 Rule 409.
PAYMENT OF MEDICAL AND SIMILAR EXPENSES
     Evidence of furnishing or offering or promising to pay medical, hospital, or similar expenses occasioned by an injury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.

 Rule 410.
INADMISSIBILITY OF PLEAS, PLEA DISCUSSIONS,
AND RELATED STATEMENTS
     Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions:

     (a)     a plea of guilty which was later withdrawn;

     (b)     a plea of nolo contendere;

     (c)     any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Rule 11 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure or comparable state procedure regarding either of the foregoing pleas; or

     (d)     any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which do not result in a plea of guilty or which result in a plea of guilty later withdrawn.

However, such a statement is admissible (i) in any proceeding wherein another statement made in the course of the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced and the statement ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously with it, or (ii) in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement if the statement was made by the defendant under oath, on the record and in the presence of counsel.

 Rule 411.
LIABILITY INSURANCE
     Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether he acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance against liability when offered for another purpose, such as proof of agency, ownership, or control, or bias or prejudice of a witness.

 Rule 412.
RAPE CASES, RELEVANCE OF VICTIM'S PAST BEHAVIOR
     (a)  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a criminal case in which a person is accused of rape or of assault with intent to commit rape, reputation or opinion evidence of the past sexual behavior of an alleged victim of such rape or assault is not admissible.

     (b)  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a criminal case in which a person is accused of rape or of assault with intent to commit rape, evidence of a victim's past sexual behavior other than reputation or opinion evidence is also not admissible, unless such evidence other than reputation or opinion evidence is--
 
          (1)     admitted in accordance with subdivision (c) and is constitutionally required to be admitted; or
 
          (2)     admitted in accordance with subdivision (c) and is evidence of --

               (A)     past sexual behavior with persons other than the accused, offered by the accused upon the issue of whether the accused was or was not, with respect to the alleged victim, the source of semen or injury; or
 
               (B)     past sexual behavior with the accused and is offered by the accused upon the issue of whether the alleged victim consented to the sexual behavior with respect to which rape or assault is alleged.

     (c)     If the person accused of committing rape or assault with intent to commit rape intends to offer under subdivision (b) evidence of specific instances of the alleged victim's past sexual behavior, the accused shall make a written motion to offer such evidence at the time set for filing of pre-trial motions under Rule 12 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, except that the court may allow the motion to be made at a later date, including during trial, if the court determines either that the evidence is newly discovered and could not have been obtained earlier through the exercise of due diligence or that the issue to which such evidence relates has newly arisen in the case.  Any motion made under this paragraph shall be accompanied by a written offer of proof and served on all other parties and on the alleged victim.  If the court determines that the offer of proof contains evidence described in subdivision (b), the court shall order a hearing in chambers to determine if such evidence is relevant and if its probative value outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice.  If so, the evidence shall be admissible to the extent an order made by the court specifies the evidence, and the areas with respect to which the alleged victim may be examined or cross-examined.

     (d)     For purpose of this rule, the term "past sexual behavior" means sexual behavior other than the sexual behavior with respect to which rape or assault with intent to commit rape is alleged.

ARTICLE V. PRIVILEGES

 Rule 501.
GENERAL RULE
     Except as otherwise required by the Constitution of the Federated States of Micronesia or provided by Act of Congress or in rules prescribed by the Chief Justice pursuant to Article XI of the Constitution, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be governed by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the Federated States of Micronesia in the light of reason and experience, including local custom and tradition.  However, in civil actions and proceedings, with respect to an element of a claim or defense as to which State law supplies the rule of decision, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be determined in accordance with State Law.

ARTICLE VI.  WITNESSES

 Rule 601.
GENERAL RULE OF COMPETENCY
     Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these Rules.  However, in civil actions and proceedings, with respect to an element of a claim or defense as to which State law supplies the rule of decision, the competency of a witness shall be determined in accordance with State law.

 Rule 602.
LACK OF PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE
     A witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that he has personal knowledge of the matter.  Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the testimony of the witness himself.  This rule is subject to the provisions of rule 703, relating to opinion testimony by expert witnesses.

 Rule 603.
OATH OR AFFIRMATION
     Before testifying, every witness shall be required to declare that he will testify truthfully, by oath or affirmation administered in a form calculated to awaken his conscience and impress his mind with his duty to do so.

 Rule 604.
INTERPRETERS
     An interpreter is subject to the provisions of these rules relating to qualification as an expert and the administration of an oath or affirmation that he will make a true translation.

 Rule 605.
COMPETENCY OF JUDGE AS WITNESS
     The judge presiding at the trial may not testify in that trial as a witness.  No objections need be made in order to preserve the point.

 Rule 606.
COMPETENCY OF JUROR AS WITNESS
     (a)     Vacant.
 
     (b)     Vacant.

 Rule 607.
WHO MAY IMPEACH
     The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling him.

 Rule 608.
EVIDENCE OF CHARACTER AND CONDUCT OF WITNESS
     (a)     Opinion and reputation evidence of character.   The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but subject to these limitations:  (1) the evidence may refer only to character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, and (2) evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the character of the witness for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation evidence or otherwise.

     (b)     Specific instance of conduct.   Specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or support his credibility, other than conviction of crime as provide in rule 609, may not be proved by extrinsic evidence.  They may, however, in the discretion of the court, if probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness, be inquired into on cross-examination of the witness: (1) concerning his character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, or (2)  concerning the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of another witness as to which character the witness being cross-examined has testified.
 
     The giving of testimony, whether by an accused or by any other witness, does not operate as a waiver of his privilege against self-incrimination when examined with respect to matters which relate only to credibility.

 Rule 609.
IMPEACHMENT BY EVIDENCE OF CONVICTION OF CRIME
     (a)     General rule.   For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination but only if the crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which he was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the defendant, or (2) involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment.

     (b)     Time Limit.       Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction, whichever is the later date, unless the court determines, in the interests of justice, that the probative value of the conviction, supported by specific facts and circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.  However, evidence of a conviction more than 10 years old as calculated herein, is not admissible unless the proponent gives to the adverse party sufficient advance written notice of intent to use such evidence to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to contest the use of such evidence.

     (c)     Effect of pardon, annulment, or certificate of rehabilitation.  Evidence of a conviction is not admissible under this rule if (1) the conviction has been the subject of pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of the rehabilitation of the person convicted, and that person has not been convicted of a subsequent crime which was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year, or (2) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence.
 
     (d)     Juvenile adjudications.  Evidence of juvenile adjudications is generally not admissible under this rule.  The court may, however, in a criminal case allow evidence of a juvenile adjudication of a witness other than the accused if conviction of the offense would be admissible to attack the credibility of an adult and the court is satisfied that admission in evidence is necessary for a fair determination of the issue of guilt or innocence.

     (e)     Pendency of appeal.  The pendency of an appeal therefrom does not render evidence of a conviction inadmissible.  Evidence of the pendency of an appeal is admissible.

 Rule 610.
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR OPINIONS
     Evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible for the purpose of showing that by reason of their nature his credibility is impaired or enhanced.

 Rule 611.
MODE AND ORDER OF INTERROGATION AND PRESENTATION
     (a)     Control by court.    The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1)  make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.

     (b)     Scope of cross-examination.   Cross-examination should be limited to the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness.  The court may, in the exercise of discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters as if on direct examination.

     (c)     Leading questions.  Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop his testimony.  Ordinarily leading questions should be permitted on cross-examination.  When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party,  interrogation may be by leading questions.

 Rule 612.
WRITING USED TO REFRESH MEMORY
     If a witness uses a writing to refresh his memory for the purpose of testifying, either:

     (1)     while testifying, or

     (2)     before testifying, if the court in its discretion determines it is necessary in the interests of justice, an adverse party is entitled to have the writing produced at the hearing, to inspect it, to cross-examine the witness thereon, and to introduce in evidence those portions which relate to the testimony of the witness.  If it is claimed that the writing contains matters not related to the subject matter of the testimony the court shall examine the writing in camera, excise any portions not so related, and order delivery of the remainder to the party entitled thereto.  Any portion withheld over objections shall be preserved and made available to the appellate court in the event of an appeal.  If a writing is not produced or delivered pursuant to order under this rule, the court shall make any order justice requires, except that in criminal cases when the prosecution elects not to comply, the order shall be one striking the testimony or, if the court in its discretion determines that the interests of justice so require, declaring a mistrial.

 Rule 613.
PRIOR STATEMENTS OF WITNESSES
     (a)     Examining witness concerning prior statement.  In examining a witness concerning a prior statement made by him, whether written or not, the statement need not be shown nor its contents disclosed to him at that time, but on request the same shall be shown or disclosed to opposing counsel.

     (b)     Extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statement of witness.  Extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is not admissible unless the witness is afforded an opportunity to explain or deny the same and the opposite party is afforded an opportunity to interrogate him thereon, or the interests of justice otherwise require.  This provision does not apply to admissions of a party-opponent as defined in rule 801(d)(2).

 Rule 614.
CALLING AND INTERROGATION OF WITNESSES BY COURT
     (a)    Calling by court.  The court may, on its own motion or at the suggestion of a party, call witnesses, and all parties are entitled to cross-examine witnesses thus called.

     (b)     Interrogation by court.  The court may interrogate witnesses, whether called by itself or by a party.

     (c)     Objections.  Objections to the calling of witnesses by the court or to interrogation by it may be made at the time or at the next available opportunity when the jury is not present.

 RULE 615.
EXCLUSION OF WITNESS
     At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion.  This rule does not authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or (3) a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of his cause.

ARTICLE VII.     OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY

 Rule 701.
OPINION TESTIMONY BY LAY WITNESSES
     If the witness is not testifying as an expert, his testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.

 Rule 702.
TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
     If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge, including the knowledge of experts on local tradition and custom, will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.

 Rule 703.
BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
     The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to him at or before the hearing.  If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.

 Rule 704.
OPINION ON ULTIMATE ISSUE
     Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.

 Rule 705.
DISCLOSURE OF FACTS OR DATE
UNDERLYING EXPERT OPINION
     The expert may testify in terms of opinion or inference and give his reasons therefore without prior disclosure of the underlying facts or data, unless the court requires otherwise.  The expert may in any event be required to disclose the underlying facts or data on cross-examination.

 Rule 706.
COURT APPOINTED EXPERTS
     (a)     Appointment.  The court may on its own motion or on the motion of any party enter an order to show cause why expert witnesses should not be appointed, and may request the parties to submit nominations.  The court may appoint any expert witness agreed upon by the parties, and may appoint expert witnesses of its own selection.   An expert witness shall not be appointed by the court unless he consents to act.  A witness so appointed shall be informed of his duties by the court in writing, a copy of which shall be filed with the clerk, or at a conference in which the parties shall have opportunity to participate.  A witness so appointed shall advise the parties of his findings, if any; his deposition may be taken by any party; and he may be called to testify by the court or any party.  He shall be subject to cross-examination by each party, including a party calling him as a witness.

     (b)     Compensation.  Expert witnesses so appointed are entitled to reasonable compensation in whatever sum the court may allow.  The compensation thus fixed is payable from funds which may be provided by law in criminal cases.  In civil actions and proceedings the compensation shall be paid by the parties in such proportion and at such time as the court directs, and thereafter charged in like manner as other costs.

     (c)     Vacant.

     (d)     Parties' experts of own selection.  Nothing in this rule limits the parties in calling expert witnesses of their own selection.

ARTICLE VIII.  HEARSAY

 Rule 801.
DEFINITIONS
     The following definitions apply under this article:

     (a)     Statement.  A "statement" is (1) an oral or written assertion or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by him as an assertion.

     (b)     Declarant.  A declarant" is a person who makes a statement.

     (c)     Hearsay.  "Hearsay" is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

     (d)     Statements which are not hearsay.  A statement is not hearsay if--

        (1)     Prior statement by witness.  The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the state is (A) inconsistent with his testimony, and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition, or (B) consistent with his testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against him of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive, or (C) one of identification of a person made after perceiving him: or

        (2)     Admission by party-opponent.  The statement is offered against a party and is (A) his own statement, in either his individual or a representative capacity or (B) a statement of which he has manifested his adoption or belief in its truth, or (C)  a statement by a person authorized by him to make a statement concerning the subject, or (D)  a statement by his agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of his agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship, or (E)  a statement by a conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.

 Rule 802.
HEARSAY RULE
     Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by these rules or by other rules prescribed by the Chief Justice pursuant to Article XI of the Constitution, or by statute enacted by the Congress of the Federated States of Micronesia.

 Rule 803.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS;
AVAILABILITY OF DECLARANT IMMATERIAL
     The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness:

     (1)     Present sense impression.  A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.

     (2)     Excited utterance.   A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.

     (3)     Then existing mental, emotional or physical condition.   A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of declarant's will.

     (4)     Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment.  Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof or insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.

     (5)     Recorded recollection.  A memorandum or record concerning  a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable him to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been made or adopted by the witness when the matter was fresh in his memory and to reflect that knowledge correctly.

     (6)     Records of regularly conducted activity.  A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinion, or diagnosis, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memoranda, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness.  The term "business" as used in this paragraph includes business, institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind, whether or not conducted for profit.

     (7)     Absence of entry in records kept in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (6).  Evidence that a matter is not included in the memoranda reports, records, or data compilations, in any form, kept in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (6), to prove the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of the matter, if the matter was of a kind of which a memoranda, report,  record,  or data compilation was regularly made and preserved unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.

     (8)     Public records and reports.   Records, reports, statement, or data compilation, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (A) the activities of the office or agency, or (B) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, in criminal cases matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel, or (C) in civil actions and proceedings and against the Government in criminal case, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.

     (9)     Records of vital statistics.  Records or data compilations, in any form, of births, fetal deaths, deaths or marriages, if the report thereof was made to a public office pursuant to requirements of law.

     (10)     Absence of public record or entry.  To prove the absence of a record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, or the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of a matter of which a record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, was regularly made and preserved by a public office or agency, evidence in the form of a certification in accordance with rule 902, or testimony, that diligent search failed to disclose the record, report, statement, or data compilation, or entry.

     (11)     Records of religious organizations.  Statements of births, marriages, divorces, deaths, legitimacy, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar facts of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization.

     (12)     Marriage, baptismal, and similar certificates.  Statements of fact contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, made by a clergyman, public official, or other person authorized by the rules of practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and purporting to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter.

     (13)     Family records.  Statements of fact  concerning personal or family history contained in family Bibles, genealogies, charts, engravings on rings, inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones, or the like.

     (14)     Records of documents affecting an interest in property.  The records of a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, as proof of the content of the original recorded document and its execution and delivery by each person by whom it purports to have been executed, if the record is a record  of a public office and an applicable statute authorizes the recording of documents of that kind in that office.

     (15)     Statements in documents affecting an interest in property.  A statement contained in a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property if the matter stated was relevant to the purpose of the document, unless dealings with the property since the document was made have been inconsistent with the truth of the statement or the purport of the document.

     (16)     Statements in ancient documents.  Statements in a document in existence twenty years or more the authenticity of which is established.

     (17)     Market reports, commercial publications.  Market quotations, tabulations, lists, directories, or other published compilations, generally used and relied upon by the public or by persons in particular occupations.

     (18)     Learned treaties.  To extent called to the attention of an expert witness upon cross-examination or relied upon by him in direct examination, statement, contained in published treatises, periodicals, or pamphlets established as a reliable authority by the testimony or admission of the witness or by other expert testimony or by judicial notice.  If admitted, the statements may be read into evidence but may not be received as exhibits.

     (19)     Reputation concerning personal or family history.  Reputation among members of his family by blood, adoption, or marriage, or among his associates, or in the community, concerning a person's birth, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of his personal or family history.

     (20)     Reputation concerning boundaries or general history.  Reputation in a community,  arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community and reputation as to events of general history important to the community or State or nation in which located.

     (21)     Reputation as to character.  Reputation of a person's character among his associates or in the community.

     (22)     Judgment of previous conviction.  Evidence of a final judgment, entered after a trial or upon a plea of guilty (but not upon a plea of nolo contendere), adjudging a person guilty of a crime punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year, to prove any fact essential to sustain the judgment, but not including, when offered by the Government in a criminal prosecution for purposes other than impeachment, judgments against persons other than the accused.  The pendency of an appeal may be shown but does not affect admissibility.

     (23)     Judgment as to personal, family, or general history, or boundaries.  Judgments as proof of matters of personal, family or general history or boundaries essential to the judgment, if the same would be provable by evidence of reputation.

     (24)     Other exceptions.  A statement not specifically covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, if the court determines that (A) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B)  the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C)  the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.  However, a statement may not be admitted under this exception unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet it, his intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.

 Rule 804.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS;
DECLARANT UNAVAILABLE
     (a)     Definition of unavailability.   "Unavailability as witness"  includes situations in which the declarant --

          (1)     is exempted by ruling of the court on the ground of privilege from testifying concerning the subject matter of his statement; or

          (2)     persists in refusing to testify concerning the subject matter of his statement despite an order of the court to do so; or

          (3)     testifies to a lack of memory of the subject matter of his statement; or
          (4)     is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; or
 
          (5)     is absent from the hearing and the proponent of his statement has been unable to procure his attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception under subdivision (b) (2), (3), or (4), his attendance or testimony) by process or other reasonable means.
 
     A declarant is not unavailable as a witness if his  exemption, refusal, claim of lack of memory, inability, absence is due to the procurement or wrongdoing of the proponent of his statement for the purpose of preventing the witnesses from attending or testifying.

     (b)     Hearsay exceptions.  The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable a witness:

          (1)     Former testimony.  Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of the same or another proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered, or in a civil action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest, had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination.

          (2)     Statement under belief of impending death.  In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, a statement made by a declarant while believing that his death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of what he believed to be his impending death.

          (3)     Statement against interest.   A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject him to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by him against another, that a reasonable man in his position would not have made the statement unless he believed it to be true.  A statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to  exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.

          (4)     Statement of personal or family history.  (A)  A statement concerning  the declarant's own birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of personal or family history, even though declarant had no means of acquiring personal knowledge of the matter stated; or (B) a statement concerning the foregoing matters, and death also, of another person, if the declarant was  related to the other by blood, adoption, or marriage or was so intimately associated with the other's family as to be likely to have accurate information concerning the matter declared.

          (5)     Statement of Recent Perception.  A statement, not in response to the instigation of a person engaged in investigating, litigating, or settling a claim, which narrates, describes, or explains an event or condition recently perceived by the declarant, made in good faith, not in contemplation of pending or anticipated litigation in which he was interested, and while his recollection was clear.

          (6)     Other exceptions.  A statement not specifically covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, if the court determines  that (A) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.  However, a statement may not be admitted under this exception unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet it, his intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.

 Rule 805.
HEARSAY WITHIN HEARSAY
     Hearsay included within hearsay is not excluded under the hearsay rule if each part of the combined statements conforms with an exception to the hearsay rule provided in these rules.

 Rule 806.
ATTACKING AND SUPPORTING CREDIBILITY OF DECLARANT
     When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Rule 801(d)(2), (C), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked and if attacked may be supported, by any evidence which would be admissible for those purposes if declarant had testified as a witness.  Evidence of a statement or conduct by the declarant at any time, inconsistent with his hearsay statement, is not subject to any requirement that he may have been afforded an opportunity to deny or explain.  If the party against whom a hearsay statement has been admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party is entitled to examine him on the statement as if under cross-examination.

ARTICLE IX.  AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION

 Rule 901.
REQUIREMENT OF AUTHENTICATION OR IDENTIFICATION
     (a)     General provision.  The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.

     (b)     Illustrations.  By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this rule:

          (1)     Testimony of witness with knowledge.  Testimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be.

          (2)     Nonexpert opinion on handwriting.   Nonexpert  opinion as to the genuineness of handwriting, based upon familiarity not acquired for purpose of the litigation.

          (3)     Comparison by trier or expert witness.  Comparison by the trier of fact or by expert witnesses with specimens which have been authenticated.

          (4)     Distinctive characteristics and the like.  Appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics, taken in conjunction with circumstances.

          (5)     Voice identification.  Identification of voice, whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the voice at any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker.

          (6)     Telephone conversations.  Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number particular person or business, if (A) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self-identification,  show the person answering  to be the one called, or (B) in the case of a business, the call was made to a place of business and the conversation related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.

          (7)     Public records or reports.   Evidence that a writing authorized by law to be recorded or filed and in fact recorded or filed in a public office, or a purported public record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, is from the public office where items of this nature are kept.

          (8)     Ancient documents or data compilation.  Evidence that a document or data compilation, in any form,  (A) is in such a condition as to create no suspicion concerning its authenticity,  (B)  was in a place where it, if authentic, would likely be, and (C) has been in existence 20 years or more at the time it is offered.

          (9)     Process or system.   Evidence describing a process or system used to produce a result and showing that the process or system produces an accurate result.

          (10)     Methods provided by statute or rule.   Any method of authentication or identification provided by Act of Congress or by other rules prescribed by the Kosrae State Court pursuant to statutory authority.

 Rule 902.
SELF-AUTHENTICATION
     Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is not required with respect to the following:

     (1)     Domestic public documents under seal.   A document bearing a seal purporting to be that of the Federated States of Micronesia, or its predecessor political entities, or of any State, municipality or political subdivision, department, officer, or agency thereof, and a signature purporting to be an attestation or execution.

     (2)     Domestic public documents not under seal.   A document purporting to bear the signature in his official capacity of an officer or employee of any entity included in paragraph (1) hereof, having no seal, if a public officer having a seal and having official duties in the district or political subdivision of the officer or employee certifies under seal that the signer has the official capacity and that the signature is genuine.

     (3)     Foreign and international public documents.   A document purporting to be executed or attested in his official capacity by a person authorized by the laws of a foreign country, or regulations of an international governmental organization, to make the execution or attestation, and accompanied by a final certification as to the genuineness of the signature and official (A)  of the executing or attesting person, or (B)  of any foreign or international official whose certificate of genuineness of signature and official position relating to the execution or attestation.  If reasonable opportunity has been given to all parties to investigate the authenticity and accuracy of official documents, the court may, for good cause shown, order that they be treated as presumptively authentic without final certification or permit them to be evidenced by an attested summary with or without final certification.

     (4)     Certified copies of public records.   A copy of an official record or report or entry therein, or of a document authorized by law to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed in a public office, including data compilations in any form, certified as correct by the custodian or other person authorized to make the certifications, by certificate complying with paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this rule or complying with any Act of Congress or rule prescribed by the Kosrae State Court pursuant to statutory authority.

     (5)     Official publications.   Books, pamphlets, or other publications purporting to be issued by public authority.

     (6)     Newspaper and periodicals.   Printed materials purporting to be newspapers or periodicals.

     (7)     Trade inscriptions and the like.   Inscriptions, signs, tags, or labels purporting to have been affixed in the course of business and indicating ownership, control, or origin.
 
     (8)     Acknowledged documents.   Documents accompanied by a certificate of acknowledgement executed in the manner provided by law by a notary public or other officer authorized by law to take acknowledgements.

     (9)     Commercial paper and related documents.   Commercial paper, signatures thereon, and documents relating thereto to the extent provided by general commercial law.

     (10)     Presumptions under Acts of Congress.   Any signature, document, or other matter declared by Act of Congress to be presumptively or prima facie genuine or authentic.

 Rule 903.
SUBSCRIBING WITNESS' TESTIMONY UNNECESSARY
     The testimony of a subscribing witness is not necessary  to authenticate a writing unless required by the laws of the jurisdiction whose laws govern the validity of the writing.

ARTICLE X.  CONTENTS OF WRITINGS, RECORDINGS,
AND PHOTOGRAPHS

 Rule 1001.
DEFINITIONS
     For purposes of this article the following definitions are applicable:
 
     (1)     Writings and recordings.   "Writings" and "recordings" consist of letters, words, or numbers, or their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, magnetic impulse, mechanical or electronic recording, or other form of data compilation.

     (2)     Photographs.   "Photographs" include still photographs, X-ray films, Video tapes, and motion pictures.

     (3)     Original.  An "original" of a writing or recording is the writing or recording itself or any counterpart intended to have the same effect by a person executing or issuing it.  An "original" of a photograph includes the negative or any print therefrom.  If data are stored in a computer or similar device, any print-out or other output readable by sight, shown to reflect the data accurately, is an "original".

     (4)     Duplicate.   A "duplicate" is a counterpart produced by the same impression as the original, or from the same matrix, or by means of photography, including enlargements and miniatures, or by mechanical or electronic re-recording, or by chemical reproduction, or by other equivalent techniques which accurately reproduces the original.

 Rule 1002.
REQUIREMENT OF ORIGINAL
     To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress.

 Rule 1003.
ADMISSIBILITY OF DUPLICATES
     A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original.

 Rule 1004.
ADMISSIBILITY OF OTHER EVIDENCE OF CONTENTS
     The original is not required, and other evidence of the contents of a writing, recording, or photographs is admissible if--

     (1)     Originals lost or destroyed.   All originals are lost or have been destroyed, unless the proponent lost or destroyed them in bad faith; or

     (2)     Original not obtainable.   No original can be obtained by any available judicial process or procedure; or

     (3)     Original in possession of opponent.   At a time when an original was under the control of the party against whom offered, he was put on notice, by the pleadings or otherwise, that the contents would be a subject of proof at the hearing, and he does not produce the original at the hearing; or

     (4)     Collateral matters.    The writing, recording, or photograph is not closely related to a controlling issue.

Rule 1005.
PUBLIC RECORDS
     The contents of an official record, or of a document authorized to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed, including data compilations in any form, if otherwise admissible, may be proved by copy, certified as correct in accordance with rule 902 or testified to be correct by a witness who has compared it with the original.  If a copy which complies with the foregoing cannot be obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence, then other evidence of the contents may be given.

                                                        Rule 1006.
                                                      SUMMARIES
     The contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary, or calculation.  The originals, or duplicates, shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at reasonable time and place.  The court may order that they be produced in court.

 Rule 1007.
TESTIMONY OR WRITTEN ADMISSION OF PARTY
     Contents of writings, recordings, or photographs may be proved by the testimony or deposition of the party against whom offered or by his written admission, without accounting for the nonproduction of the original.

ARTICLE XI.  MISCELLANEOUS RULES

 Rule 1101.
APPLICABILITY OF RULES
     (a)     Courts.   These rules apply to proceedings of the Kosrae State Court of the Federated States of Micronesia and to the actions of state judicial officers to the extent they are acting in proceedings pursuant to the Federated States of Micronesia Kosrae State Court Rules of Civil Procedure or Criminal Procedure and in other proceedings to the extent set forth.  The terms "judge" and "court" in these rules include such state judicial officers.

     (b)     Proceedings generally.   These rules apply generally to civil proceedings, including admiralty and maritime cases, to criminal proceedings, and to contempt proceedings except those in which the court may act summarily.

     (c)     Rules of privilege.   The rule with respect to privileges applies at all stages of all actions, cases, and proceedings.

     (d)     Rules inapplicable.   The rules (other than with respect to privileges) do not apply in the following situations:

          (1)     Preliminary questions of fact.   The determination of questions of fact preliminary to admissibility of evidence when the issue is to be determined by the court under rule 104.

          (2)     Vacant.

          (3)     Miscellaneous proceedings.   Proceedings for extradition or rendition; preliminary examinations in criminal cases; sentencing, or granting or revoking probation; issuance of warrants for arrest, criminal summonses, and search warrants; and proceedings with respect to release on bail or otherwise.

     (e)     Vacant.

 Rule 1102.
AMENDMENTS
Vacant.

 Rule 1103.
TITLE
     These rules may be known and cited as the FSM Rules of Evidence.